Sunday, 30 December 2018

Surviving Capitalism Speaker: Derek Wall

Croydon Trades Union Council invites you to our next discussion:

Surviving Capitalism
Speaker: Derek Wall

Thursday 10 January 2019 7.30pm

Ruskin House
23 Coombe Road
Croydon CR0 1BD

Climate change and other ecological problems threaten human society, yet with the rise of right wing or even fascist leaders like Jair Bolsonaro, the new Brazilian President, there is a fear that rather than reformism, policies to accelerate environmental destruction will be promoted. Derek Wall will discuss green trade unionism, the red-green labour project, the extinction rebellion movement and other projects aimed at challenging the apparent rush to destruction.

Derek Wall is a former Principal Speaker and International Coordinator of the Green Party. A leading ecosocialist, he argues that environmental problems can only be overcome by challenging capitalism He has written 13 books on green and ecosocialist politics, the most recent is Hugo Blanco: A Revolutionary for Life published by Merlin Press. He also teaches political economy at Goldsmiths College, University of London.

Tickets @

Sunday, 16 December 2018

Stansted 15

Stansted 15

The Stansted 15 are a group of concerned citizens who peacefully stopped a deportation flight to Nigeria and Ghana at Stansted airport on 28 March 2017.
They have now been convicted. The Stansted 15 expected to face retribution for their protest. They never expected to be found guilty of terrorism offences. But the group became the first activists involved in a non-violent direct action protest to be convicted under laws that were formulated in response to the Lockerbie bombing.
The group had information of people meant to be on that flight, who would be put in extreme danger if they were forcibly returned. The group knew about their stories from the website Detained Voices. For example, a lesbian women feared persecution by the Nigerian authorities if returned to Nigeria, her abusive ex husband who she was made to marry had also told her he would kill her on return. Nigeria is one of the most dangerous places in the world for LGBT people. The Stansted 15 also knew that the Home Office was not respecting rule of law, some of the people scheduled to be on the plane had ongoing claims and had not exhausted the legal process. The Stansted 15 were deeply concerned about the treatment of detained people during the deportation process as well.
Write to the Crown Prosecution Service to protest –
Walthamstow resident and Stansted 15 protester Melanie Strickland on why she’ll keep fighting to help vulnerable deportees
I was convicted of an absurd terror-related charge this week, on International Human Rights Day. The Stansted 15 – as we are known – have been tried for “endangering safety at airports” following our peaceful action against a deportation plane set to fly to Ghana and Nigeria in March 2017.
This charge, and the way the prosecution made its case throughout, has been political and vindictive. We were subjected to a ten-week trial at what must have been vast public expense.
I am proud of what we did and what the groups involved – End Deportations, Plane Stupid, and Lesbians and Gays Support the Migrants – have achieved. We helped to expose a massive government scandal.
We now know that the government has been deporting people en masse on a routine basis – many of these people had claims that had not been heard properly. In doing so, the Home Office has shown contempt for rule of law and due process.
Eleven of the 60 people scheduled to be on the plane we stopped remain in the country today. These people include trafficking survivors and people who have claimed asylum. At least one person has already secured leave to remain.
If I was put in a situation of extreme danger by my own government, as people on the plane we stopped were, I would want someone to intervene on my behalf. In March 2017 I was responding to a plea from someone I knew would be on the plane, whose story was posted on Detained Voices when they got the ticket for the deportation plane. They said: “I came to England for protection, I seek asylum here. I believe the UK could help me… Nobody hears our cry. We are crying. Please, we need to be rescued. Please can anybody helps us?”
From volunteering at Walthamstow Migrant Support Centre, I know about the misery experienced by people subject to immigration control. I found this person’s story compelling and totally credible.
The Home Office routinely breaks the law in refusing people’s claims without good reason, and in deporting them. They haven’t confirmed if the 49 people subsequently deported from our flight were of the Windrush generation, and they haven’t contacted those affected to tell them about the newly-established Windrush Taskforce.
If the government can totally disregard the law and get away with it, then none of us are safe – all our rights are under threat. The hostile environment is hostile to all of us. While these charter planes carrying deportees are still flying, we will keep up the campaign to end this brutal practice. It is now my mission to hold the government to account for its dark deeds.
I think about the people on the plane every day. Their words give me courage: “When something is wrong people have to stand up. The problem is with the Home Office. No-one checks on them, they have absolute power over peoples lives. They do whatever they want. People must stand up against injustice. We are very proud of the protesters. They did the right thing.”

– Charter flights (private, mass deportation flights chartered by the Home Office), like the plane stopped, are a particularly brutal, secretive and barely legal plank of the hostile environment policy as championed by Theresa May. People are racially targeted based on their perceived nationality, then ripped from their communities, friends and loved ones before they are forcibly deported. People are often deported before they can get access to a decent lawyer. Legal aid is available in limited cases and it’s very difficult to access even where it is available. People are seriously abused by guards involved in the deportation process. Being tranquillised, ‘dragged like a goat’ in a restraint belt, and racially abused, are all commonplace experiences. Charter flights take place in the middle of the night in a remote part of Stansted airport where the public cannot observe the dark deeds that are taking place. This offends common decency.
You can find a lot of information on the End Deportations website…

Facts:The Stansted 15 have been the targets of a political frame up. They have been charged with endangering safety at airports under terrorism-related legislation. They have ensured a 10 week trial so far. The Government is in fact guilty of the charge the State has levied against the Stansted 15 – the Government endangers people every day with their brutal, unfair hostile environment policies and particularly the barbaric practice of charter flights.
– Decent people must be united in their condemnation of charter flights and their solidarity with the Stansted 15. Peaceful dissent to defend our rights – and those of our migrant brothers and sisters – is noted never could be an act of terror. State terror must be identified, called out, and opposed.
– The action by the Stansted 15 has mean that 11 of the 60 people due to be deported that night are still in the UK with their friends and families. More details from the House of Commons website…



"I pledge to not attend or organise any events at the University of London central administration (including Senate House, Stewart House, the Warburg Institute, the Institute of Historical Research, the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies and Student Central) until all outsourced workers (including cleaners, receptionists, security officers, catering staff, porters, audiovisual workers, gardeners and maintenance workers) are made direct employees of the University of London on equal terms and conditions with other directly employed staff." - sign up here...

Friday, 14 December 2018

protest events supporting the Stansted 15

'martin empson' via Climate Trade Union

3:07 PM (48 minutes ago)
to Climate-change-trade-union
Dear all,

There are lots of protest events being called supporting the Stansted 15 who were found guilty under terrorism legislation this week. Here is a list of those that I know about. 



Martin Empson
Treasurer, Campaign Against Climate Change Trade Union group
079 585 35231

Sunday, 2 December 2018

Green Party Trade Union group recommends a vote AGAINST the Holistic Review.

Green Party Trade Union group recommends a vote AGAINST the Holistic Review.

GPTU voted at its meeting on 27/11/2018 to ask Green Party members to vote against the Holistic Review proposals for reform of the Party. Our main reason for this is that these proposals would remove the post of Trade Union Liaison Officer which is currently part of the Party executive (GPEX) and do not provide any alternative permanent link to Trade Unions involved in the governance of the Party.
The Holistic Review does recognise the importance of some representation for other groups, such as Seniors and Young Greens, but by not making provision for a Trade Union link the Party could end up effectively sending the message that it is not concerned about workers. The party is starting to take a lead on insecure working practices, housing, benefits, education and health and social care. All these issues affect working class people, the exact same people that are represented by the trade union movement.
Green Party policy already supports people's rights to organise themselves in order to secure better working and living conditions, but if Trade Union representation is reduced what will this really mean?
Trade Unions cannot just be dealt on the basis of temporary ‘task and finish’ groups. By working consistently with such groups as ‘The Campaign against Climate Change’, ‘The Greener Jobs Alliance’ and the ‘Lucas Plan’ the Green Party has increased its credibility within the Trade Union movement and played a part in getting Unions to acknowledge the vital importance for everyone ofcombating climate change.

We believe that if the Holistic Review were to pass, there will be a democratic deficit in the party, and cause splits amongst the hard working members. Change is important in our party, but this is not the way.
If the Green Party sends a signal that it is not really interested in building and sustaining a relationship with the Trade Union movement and all the millions of people it actually and potentially represents it is effectively presenting itself as a ‘middle class’ movement without anything to offer to or concern the majority of people.  Let’s present ourselves as the movement for change and equality that we all want to see.  

Vote No to the Holistic Review.  

Wednesday, 28 November 2018

Support for FE fightback from .Green Party Trade Union group

The Green Party Trade Union group sends support to UCU members striking today in Swindon New College, Peroc College, Lambeth College, Bradford College, Croydon College as part of the campaign for for a decent deal for FE staff 

 ( see

 GPTU recognises that Further Education is an important but often underrated part of the education system which needs proper funding and pay and conditions for its staff especially as the work of FE has an important role in a just transition to a low carbon economy. 

 yours in solidarity Peter Murry 
London Green Parties' Trade Union Liaison Officer pp Green Party Trade Union group

Saturday, 24 November 2018

UCU response to life imprisonment of Durham University student in UAE

UCU response to life imprisonment of Durham University student in UAE

UCU said the government and universities needed to secure stronger assurances on human rights and the treatment of academics working abroad.
The union was responding to news that Matthew Hedges, a PhD student from Durham University, has been jailed for life in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) after travelling to Dubai to conduct research.
The union said that while politicians and universities had been quick to embrace states like the UAE, they needed to make it clear that they would not tolerate attacks on human rights. The University of Birmingham has been under fire recently for watering down a commitment to LGBT rights at its campus in Dubai.
UCU head of policy and campaigns Matt Waddup said: 'The government has a responsibility to ensure that British citizens abroad get treated fairly and receive a fair trial. For a country that we deem as an ally to act like this is unconscionable.
'British universities may be keen to launch overseas campuses in places like the UAE, but this case demonstrates that they need to seek stronger assurances on human rights and the treatment of academics.'
Durham UCU branch president Sarah Elton said: 'We are shocked and horrified at the life sentence given to Matthew. His arrest and imprisonment is a threat to academic freedom and research. We call on the Foreign Office to take immediate steps to secure Matthew's rapid acquittal and release".
Durham University has suspended all field research in the UAE, while lecturers at the University of Exeter, where Hedges did his master’s degree, have voted in favour of an academic boycott and called on the vice-chancellor to suspend all business partnerships with the Gulf state.
Lecturers at the University of Exeter have unanimously backed a motion calling on its vice-chancellor, Prof Sir Steve Smith, to lobby for Hedges’ release and to suspend academic relations with the UAE until his situation is resolved.
João Florêncio, the secretary of the Exeter branch of the University and College Union (UCU), said: “Our members are very worried about Matt Hedges’ predicament and the seeming curtailing of the academic freedom of colleagues travelling to the UAE for work. As such, our general meeting has unanimously called for an academic boycott of the UAE until the situation is satisfactorily resolved. That includes asking that the University of Exeter temporarily suspends its doctoral programme in Dubai and lobbies for the immediate release of Matt Hedges.”

Tuesday, 20 November 2018


HOUSMANS IN-STORE EVENTS UPDATEA late addition to our events programme:

1. Student discount night at Housmans
Tuesday, 27th November, 6.30pm onwards

From 6.30pm to 8.30pm come grab a free beer and get a 20% discount off any purchase on display of your student ID at Housmans! 
Facebook event here

2. 'Corbyn: The Resurrection' with Steve Bell
Wednesday 21st November, 7pm
The Guardian's long-time cartoonist Steve Bell will be sharing his thoughts on the state of British politics and we'll have the projector out to show some pictures from his new Corbyn-centered collection too!
Click here for more info

3. AUTONOMY NOW present: 'Great Anarchists' with Ruth KinnaFriday 30th November, 7pm

Launch of new pamphlet series from Dog Section Press. These short introductions delve into the anarchist canon to recover some of the distinctive ideas that historical anarchists advanced to address problems relevant to their circumstances.
Click here for more info
4. 'Marx Returns' a book launch and discussion with Jason Barker, Alberto Toscano and Matthew Beaumont
Wednesday 5th December, 7pm
Join writer and filmmaker Jason Barker talking about his acclaimed new novel and what the revolutionary life and ideas of Karl Marx might mean for our current political crises. Joining the conversation will be Alberto Toscano (Reader in Critical Theory, Goldsmiths) and Matthew Beaumont (Professor of English Literature, UCL).
Click here for more info
5. The Left Case Against the EU with Costas Lapavitsas 
Saturday 8th December, 7pm
With Brexit negotiations reaching their crunch point by December, join us for what will no doubt be a fascinating discussion on what lies ahead for European politics.
Click here for more info
6. 'A Radical History of the World' with Neil Faulkner
Wednesday 12th December, 7pm
History is a weapon. The powerful have their version of events, the people have another. And if we understand how the past was forged, we arm ourselves to change the future. Join Neil to give an overview of a people's history of the world, compressed into an hour! Based on his new book published by Pluto Press.
Click here for more info
If you want to be removed from this email list please send an email to shop(at) with 'unsubscribe newsletter' in the subject field. 
Housmans Bookshop,
5 Caledonian Road,
London N1 9DX
Tel: +44 (0)20 7837 4473 
shop email:   
"Support the shop that supports your campaigns!"

Sunday, 11 November 2018

Why Universal Credit Should Become a Core Trade Union Issue

Why Universal Credit Should Become a Core Trade Union Issue

A briefing on Universal Credit, prepared by Waltham Forest Stand Up for your Rights, who have called for a protest against Universal Credit on December 1st, 11am at Chingford Mount [E4 9AA] in the constituency of Ian Duncan Smith, the author of the scheme.
Who in the Future will be Affected by Universal Credit (UC)?
1. To date, of the 1 million households now on UC, the vast majority (except in local pilot areas), have been the unemployed. However that is about to change. From now on across the country all new or updated benefit claims (with a few exceptions) including those in work who receive Tax Credits have to be made through UC.
2. DWP also plans to force everyone on benefits (including those on Working and Child Tax Credits) to claim UC even if there has been no change in their circumstances. DWP has refused to initiate transfers of Tax Credit claims on to a UC regime. Instead people have to initiate UC applications, a fraught and costly process. Testing forced transfers, called ‘managed migration’ by DWP, is due to start for some Tax Credit recipients in July 2019.
3. Nationally, DWP’s plans mean 3 in 4 of the planned total of 7 million families on UC, would be in work. So of the estimated 16 million people nationally in families receiving UC, around 12 million would be in working families.
4. This note outlines the Department of Work and Pensions’ (DWP) plans on UC as at early November 2018. These plans have changed many times. DWP has said they may change again if more problems with UC come to light.
5. UC has been criticised by welfare and other advice agencies after cases of severe hardship came to light and a series of analyses on the impact of UC especially after funding was cut. Arguably UC has become so discredited that what its future should be and indeed whether it should have a future is a matter for serious political debate.
Why have People found the UC Application Process so Fraught?
6. Firstly the forms are very lengthy – running to tens of pages. Secondly DWP want people to fill them in online. Even experienced advisers find the process; setting up accounts, locating and scanning in all the documents which DWP require to ‘verify’ a UC claim, often takes many hours, not counting verification visits to DWP offices.
7. DWP’s own research found barely half could complete the process without help. One in 4 claimants were not able to claim at all without help. Many have found applying for UC more difficult than applying for Tax Credits.
The UC application process is most intimidating and unsuitable for those with poor language, writing or IT skills.
The process especially frightens those with mental health problems eg anxiety, as DWP’s own research shows.
8. Thirdly the risks, if things go wrong, have been largely put on to the applicant. Imposing on applicants financial penalties arising from the complex UC application process, is unreasonable given the widely known problems people have faced in completing UC applications to DWP’s satisfaction. Government November 2018 changes have reduced, but not removed, risks imposed on people when those on Tax Credits are forced to apply for UC.
9. If people do not successfully apply within 1 month of a DWP deadline they risk losing ‘Transitional Protection’ which protects, for a while, their money if UC pays less than they get with Tax Credits. Further DWP only allow UC claims to be backdated by one month – less than the 3 months allowed for backdating of some benefit claims.
Do Tax Credit Recipients lose Money?
10. First of all, UC claimants face gaps in payment imposed by DWP in two stages. The UC system builds in a gap in payments, reduced in the 2018 Budget to a minimum of 3 weeks, after applying for UC. On top of that gap 1 in 5 claimants have faced on average a 4 week delay by DWP (ie on top of the 3 week gap) in receiving some or all of their money. DWP do not expect the % facing additional delays in some UC payment to be reduced during 2018.
11. Indeed there may well a big rise in the current UC claim processing delays by DWP under the strain of a six-fold increase in the rate of new UC claims planned by DWP for 2020 plus the more complicated circumstances of future UC claims with working income and child care costs, (unlike the mainly simpler unemployed cases so far).
12. Secondly amounts paid under UC differ from what working families get on Tax Credits. Some would get more money under UC. But overall working families face a net loss on average of about £250 a year on UC, after the 2018 Budget measures notably the higher work allowances. The Budget reduced, but did not end the losses.
13. UC losses are bigger for (mainly female) single parents, and disabled people loss of Severe Disability Premium.
UC hits women more. The combined impact of tax and benefit changes hits women 7 times as severely as men.
14. UC’s Minimum Income Floor has adverse impacts for many self-employed people eg taxi drivers, often BME.
15. Tax and benefit measures in the 2018 Budget only partially offset the overall losses since Summer 2015 from for instance the benefit freeze. Overall tax and benefit changes reduce income just for the lower income groups.
Does UC Contribute to a More Hostile Environment for Workers?
16. As well as financial losses, UC can intrude into peoples’ lives. Under the UC regime, workers can be pressed by DWP to job search to increase hours or earnings. This is worse for some eg single parents with child care duties.
17. For the first time workers are now at risk of ‘sanctions’ – loss of benefit. UK has the 2nd most demanding set of ‘benefit conditionality’ terms out of 39 countries. Under UC sanctions are 4 times more frequent than pre-UC.
18. Insisting everyone has to apply for UC online is not user friendly, especially for those nervous of computers.
Is Universal Credit Actually Simpler?
19. One advantage claimed for UC is ‘simplification’ with 6 benefits rolled up into 1. The comparison is misleading: no one person ever receives all 6 benefits simultaneously. It is also partial: UC does not include some benefits.
The difficulty of making UC claims shows that any ‘simplification’ is not usually to the advantage of applicants.
20. Other aspects of ‘simplification’ may not help people. Paying UC as one payment may be convenient for DWP, but it means women will lose out when all money goes to one person, the higher earner, usually male. At the moment Child Tax Credit and the childcare element of Working Tax Credit typically go to the woman in a family.
Women with no direct access to money find it more difficult to leave when facing domestic abuse or violence.
Are there Other Benefits of UC?
21. DWP has claimed UC increases work incentives. That is so, but to a very limited extent. For the (1 in 3) people in work facing the highest effective tax rates they are cut from slightly over 90% to 85% with UC. The evidence is such incentives have little effect. Using sanctions implicitly admits that the work incentives are not effective.
22. DWP has argued that benefit take-up will rise under UC. But the user–unfriendly nature of UC, its toxic reputation and what an official report calls DWP’s ‘culture of indifference’, reduce the chances of higher take-up.
23. The DWP says that UC will reduce fraud and error. The NAO report refers to ‘a lack of evidence’ on this claim.
24. Government UC plans will increasingly affect people in work. Recent changes to UC have reduced the delays and the financial costs for workers, but not eliminated them. Reducing delays and more funding are not enough to make UC suitable. It is very user-unfriendly and intrudes oppressively into peoples’ lives. A harsh UC regime drives people into taking unsatisfactory work, putting downward pressure on work T&Cs – a core union concern.
25. There is a very strong case for Trade Unions to call on political parties to back ‘Stop and Scrap UC’ and, so long as UC continues, urging councils to minimise the impacts. Some Boroughs have set up information, advice and advocacy services eg Tower Hamlets, and others have committed to not evict tenants in arrears as a result of UC.
26. Pushing more people on to UC should be immediately halted, whilst a fundamental review considers the options.

Thursday, 8 November 2018

We work hard to care for service users, where’s the care for us?

I’m writing to you today because my workmates and I are about to have our pay cut.
My name’s Tracey and I’m a care worker. I regularly spend nights away from my family caring for those in need. It’s a job I love, but it’s certainly not easy.
Care provider AFG has decided to cut our pay, meaning we will earn below the minimum wage on sleep-in shifts. This will leave me and my workmates struggling to make ends meet.
This cut will amount to a loss of up to £90 per week for care workers. Over a year we could stand to lose up to £4500.
With the support of our union, Unison, we’ve started this petition demanding that AFG reverse this pay cut. Already, more than 1,500 people have signed our petition.
We want to show AFG that union members and the community support care workers earning a fair wage. We can’t do this without your support.
Morale is at rock bottom, we are all such good workers but the company has shown no loyalty to us. We used to put 110% in. Now we feel worthless.
We work hard to care for service users, where’s the care for us?
Kind regards,
Care Workers for Change
P.S. Once you've signed the petition, can you share it with your friends and family? Here's the link:

UCU are holding our first day of action for disability equality in education on Wednesday 21 November

Initiated by UCU’s disabled members’ standing committee, the day of action is all about organising against discrimination and will focus on the challenges and barriers faced by disabled people in education.
The day will culminate in a meeting in parliament. This meeting will have involvement of the TUC and campus unions as well as disability equality campaign groups and organisations, calling for:
·  time limits for the implementation of reasonable adjustments 
·  review of building regulations to ensure that new buildings are fully accessible
·  statutory rights for disability leave
·  the right to access mainstream education and reverse the cuts for special educational needs and disability (SEND).
We need your support to make this event a success! Please contact your branch to see what activities are being planned. You can find out how to support disabled members in your workplace by using the resources and ideas here, including displaying our new wall chart, showing our short film on the social model of disability, or getting involved via social media platforms.

Share this short video clip to promote the day of action.
Please get in touch with us here for further support or with any questions.

Thank you

Elaine Heffernan
UCU national executive committee and chair of disabled members' standing committee

Disability History Month is supported by a wide range of disability groups, unions and voluntary organisations, and aims to promote disabled people's rights and their struggle for equality now and in the past. Events about disability will be held all around the UK and further information can be obtained here.